Discussion Entry: Changing Book Publishing Models

A work colleague posted a link on twitter to a very interesting story. I thought it would make a great discussion entry for this week’s assignment.

The HoTT Book

This blog article describes a new book that has been published by twenty-four mathematicians on homotopy type theory (I don’t even know what that means!). Essentially, this book was created, edited, revised, and published by the collaborative efforts of these professionals. The entire process took six months. The blog author indicates that this book breaks the mould of traditional academic publishing which often takes years of painstaking peer review correspondence with a single author. The blog author states that others are invited to review and even edit the book in a continual publication model. “Anyone can take the book and modify it, send us improvements and corrections, translate it, or even sell it without giving us any money.”

This has implications for academic research and scholarly communication that need to be reviewed and discussed, particularly in this age of open-access and continual publication. Please review the below issues and questions, and feel free to respond to any or all of these questions.

What are the exciting possibilities of this new publishing model? What are some of the concerns?

“Anyone can take the book and modify it, send us improvements and corrections, translate it, or even sell it without giving us any money.” How does this process ensure quality information for use in future research about this theory. What versions will be used? What versions will be cited and how will future researchers find the ‘correct’ version to use and cite in their own research?

This book was created in an open source fashion by twenty-four mathematicians. How will academic authors be able to document their individual work to receive appropriate credit for tenure consideration; it is still a ‘publish or perish’ world!

This has a similar open structure to Wikipedia. Typically Wikipedia may be used as a starting point, but never as a citation or ‘ending’ point in quality academic research. Will this book end up as a starting point or ending point in quality academic research given the open editing allowed.

Libraries provide access to print and online resources in an organized manner and over time. Researchers depend on libraries for stable access to quality resources far into the future. What is the role of libraries in providing access to books that continually change through open access editing? How will access to this book be ensured for 10, 20 or 50-plus years in the future, so that academic researchers then can also view this book.

This entry was posted in Books, Publishers and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Discussion Entry: Changing Book Publishing Models

  1. darlagrant says:

    Hi Beth,
    I think you have some very compelling questions here. I am excited by the possibility that writers can become authors more easily than the past. However, I do have reservations about academic publishing. In the past, experts were vetted by their colleagues, universities and publishers. In a world where anyone can publish anything, how do we know who the true experts are and who has published works that are unresearched and unsupported? I want to stand behind everyone’s right to free speech, but when it comes to academic publishing, I do like the built-in protocols that check authorial credentials.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s